More post-election commentary that makes sense. From The Economist, a more migration-based explanation than the tribal one I found a while back. I think they're both getting to the crux of the matter, which is that simple generalizations of our current political landscape are pointless. The old ways of looking at race, class, geography, and gender in regard to who votes for who are giving way to less clear-cut, but probably deeper divisions. It's going to be an interesting four years at the very least.